Law In Order’s Senior Data Governance & Business Analyst, Claudia Simpson, recently joined The People In Legal Podcast – Law and Beyond for a special careers episode, exploring the evolution of legal technology, the importance of ethical AI adoption, and the value of saying “yes” to opportunity.
Hosted by Chantel McNaught and supported by Novum Global, this wideranging conversation shines a light on Claudia’s unique career journey from sociology student to a senior member of Law In Order’s Information Security and Governance teams.
Watch or Listen to the Full EpisodeFrom Litigation Support Clerk to Senior Data Governance Leader
Claudia joined Law In Order in 2018 as a Litigation Support Clerk and quickly progressed through roles across operations, training, and internal consulting. Her curiosity, peoplefirst mindset, and willingness to embrace new challenges opened doors across the business – ultimately leading her to business analysis, software development programs, and data governance.
Today, in her eighth year at Law In Order, Claudia leads initiatives across:
- Data governance and privacy compliance
- Software development and innovation programs
- Information security and ISO 27001 governance
- Change management and crossdepartment collaboration
She credits her growth to strong mentors and managers who backed her potential, as well as an organisational culture that rewards curiosity and continuous learning.
Sociology, Technology, and the Importance of the ‘Why’
With an academic grounding in sociology and English literature, Claudia brings a distinctive lens to her work in legal tech. She explains how:
- Understanding people and social systems is essential when building or integrating technology
- A peoplefirst approach leads to better organisational outcomes
- Curiosity drives both innovation and responsible decisionmaking
- Governance and compliance are not barriers – they are enablers that build trust and support performance.
Her reflections connect technology to broader societal questions: Are we asking the right questions? Are we designing responsibly? Are we making choices that protect people and data?
AI, Ethics, and the “Should We?” Question
A key theme of the episode is responsible AI adoption, as Claudia and Chantel discussed:
- Why organisations must consider should we, not just can we
- The importance of diverse teams with both optimists and cautious thinkers
- How ISO standards, including ISO 27001 and emerging AIfocused frameworks like ISO 42001, create the guardrails for safe innovation
- Why regulation, rather than slowing progress, actually empowers it
Claudia’s message is clear: Don’t jump in headfirst. Understand your organisation’s readiness, involve a range of voices, and set your guardrails early.
Governance as an Enabler, Not a Hurdle
Governance often feels daunting for law firms, but Claudia reframes it as a natural part of innovation. Her practical advice:
- Build governance into daily operational processes
- Ensure everyone, not just compliance teams, understands the “why”
- Encourage leadership to actively support governance and risk mitigation
- Treat governance as a continuous improvement cycle, not a onetime project
At Law In Order, crossfunctional collaboration between operations, IT, information security, and leadership ensures ethical practices, compliance, and innovation move forward together.
Watch or Listen to the Full Episode
Read TranscriptEpisode Transcript
0:00
Don’t jump in head first. Assess where you’re at and where this technology is
0:05
in the context of your business. And don’t just involve those people who are like, “Yes, this is going to be the
0:12
greatest thing ever. It’s going to solve all of our problems.” You need to also involve the people who are going to step back and say, “Hey, this is a risk.”
0:18
Then, you know, you look into what is best practice and how can we be compliant? How can we protect the
0:25
data that we are handling?
0:32
Welcome to the People and Legal Podcast. This is the Law and Beyond show and I am your host Chantel McNaught and we’re
0:39
exploring everything there is in the legal universe that is law, legal tech
0:45
and compliance, education and academia. And in this special careers episode
0:52
brought to you by NovGlobal, we will be discussing all things legal tech career with our special guest Claudia
0:59
Simpson. Claudia Simpson joined Law In Order in 2018 as a litigation support
1:05
clerk and quickly progressed through roles in legal services operations before moving into business analysis.
1:13
Now in her eighth year, she serves as a senior data governance and business analyst leading customer data and
1:19
privacy initiatives, software development programs, and change management, all while contributing to
1:26
the ISO 20001 compliance as part of the information security team. Claudia
1:32
credits her growth to saying yes to opportunities and to the mentors who
1:38
supported her journey. With a sociology background, she brings a people-first approach to technology and governance,
1:44
ensuring ethical, compliant, and practical solutions that empower teams and drive innovation. So, you can see
1:51
why I’m very excited to have Claudia on the show today. Without the support of our podcast partners like NovGlobal,
1:58
we can’t bring you these episodes and all editorial decisions remain with me
2:03
and the people in legal editorial team. Welcome to the show, Claudia. Hello. Thank you so much for having me.
2:10
Ah, it’s such a pleasure. Wow. You have grown quite a lot in your legal tech
2:17
career in Law In Order since starting so young. What has kept you
2:23
engaged with across so many aspects of the business and like where are you now?
2:29
But also briefly, how did you get there? Yeah. well, as you said, I am in my
2:36
eighth year at Law In Order. now a senior data governance and business analyst. A bit of a tongue tire of a
2:42
title. so yes, I’m responsible for customer data and privacy and our software development program and of
2:48
course member of the information security team as well. Like you said, started in 2018 as a litigation support
2:54
clerk on the operations floor in Sydney. So think print, copy, scan, all of those good things. I then moved into a
3:00
management role as a team leader on the operations floor. So that was a high-pressure environment, very time
3:05
sensitive delivery of client materials. Then I took on an additional role as a training coordinator as well. So I think
3:12
I credit that to the start of my change management kind of experience which definitely led into my BA role.
3:18
Interestingly the turning point for me – I undertook an internal
3:24
consulting internship so was that was successful. I was offered a role as
3:29
an eDiscovery consultant. then curveball same day I was offered
3:36
the business analyst role as well. So I took on the BA role which was the
3:43
right decision for me. I was working with all service lines and departments. So it kind of fed my passion for
3:50
helping people. This was the right fit and kind of kept me engaged across the business. Then in 2023 I was
3:59
offered the data governance privacy officer role as well. In that
4:05
space I was isolating areas for improvement of our data governance practices, initiating
4:10
change and supporting and that was all supported by my extensive knowledge from operations and of course my BA role.
4:17
knowing people and practices means you can make informed and more impactful differences. What a career
4:25
trajectory, you know, and and it sounds like you’re really well supported. I did have a question though because well
4:31
while I’m fortunate enough to be married to a business analyst of 15 years and
4:36
that’s not necessarily the case for a lot of our listeners. So are you able to I guess break down some of the basics
4:43
of what a BA does and what you’ve learned very briefly around BA
4:49
in your roles. Definitely. There are quite a few different types of BAs really. in
4:56
my role, I’m predominantly responsible for our software development program. So what that means is meeting with
5:03
stakeholders and users to understand their requirements often just in
5:08
plain language and really drilling down into their needs. I then go back to my team, my wonderful developers and I
5:16
translate my, those you know requirements into technical actionable
5:21
stories that we can innovate and build off. Aside from that I’m also responsible for change management across
5:27
the business. That doesn’t necessarily mean with our own products or building our own products. It may
What Does a Business Analyst Do?
5:34
be bringing in you know software from external vendors and many many many
5:40
different initiatives. So in my role at least as a BA I obviously
5:46
have the software development side but I tend to be kind of a catch all when people need that help to change from
5:53
from one practice to another and I do love that part of my role. It is such
5:58
a people-oriented set of skills, isn’t it? And you
6:04
know, I think this really flows onto the next couple of questions that I have for you around you know, your
6:12
opportunities to develop and how you’ve ended up being championed
6:19
and you now also champion others. You mentioned how Law In Order is an
6:25
organisation for people who are willing to take on opportunities and you know
6:31
because you say yes and then you get those mentorship and support. What does
6:36
that mean for you and how has that shaped your career in your experience?
6:43
Yeah, absolutely. well as you can see from my career trajectory Law In Order is definitely a place that
6:50
offers opportunity to those who are willing to say yes. My career has been defined by that. This environment’s
6:56
allowed me I think a foot in the door in an otherwise kind of inaccessible industry. If you’re not a lawyer, how
7:02
are you working in the legal space? As a young woman, I’m proud to have found myself in a position to champion
7:08
positive outcomes for my colleagues, our clients, but also by extension our communities. I think the core part of
7:14
how Law In Order has supported me. Aside from this, Law In Order has consistently supported me through
7:19
continuous learning. I actually worked and studied full-time at the University of Sydney undertaking an arts
7:24
degree in sociology and English. Law In Order supported me through this, giving me the flexibility to do both. and
7:31
there’s many stories like this across Yes, it was it was intense, but it was so worth it. and there’s a lot of
7:38
stories like this across the business. Some of our most core individuals in the organisation started right where I
7:43
did and like me they have a really deep understanding not only of our organisation but the legal services
7:49
industry as well. So I think all of these things together make not only Law In Order stronger but better
7:56
positioned to help our clients and again by extension our communities. That’s something I don’t ever want to
8:02
forget. The work is vital and important. Yeah. And I’m so like nerdily
8:10
excited to talk more about the that sociology point because as we were
8:17
talking about off air as well like that’s I touch on sociology in my own
8:24
PhD thesis. So, it’s really nice to have somebody who understands, but also
8:31
you understand on a different level because you’re serving the legal universe. You’re serving the lawyers in
8:37
what you do. Even if that is a little bit indirect in the sense of well, the position that that you have now is
8:45
really supporting the teams that then go on to support the lawyers. But you
8:51
clearly have like that fundamental understanding about the why and how Simon Sinek talks about it’s about the
8:58
why. Exactly. And and how like Yeah. without trying to
9:04
bandy that that academic word of sociology. It’s really like this the science of understanding people and how
9:13
people interact with each other, how we do things and accomplish things, what makes us human. I’m currently reading
9:21
A, I like to read really dense things I’ve realised about myself, and um
9:27
so just bringing it up here because I keep forgetting what it’s actually called. It’s by Ray Dio. the
Sociology & People-First Approach to Tech
9:33
principles for dealing with the changing world order. Mmmm interesting. It is really interesting because he’s
9:39
he’s like a markets guy. So like his whole he builds wealth by you know trading on
9:47
like big shifts in the markets and you wouldn’t think that that would be too closely linked to sociology
9:53
but then then he cites a whole bunch of sociology work. I would say inherently linked
9:59
definitely. Mhm. Well, yeah, and that’s basically what his thesis in in this
10:04
book is that you know, him and his team looked at the data on a lot of
10:10
the changing trends in empires and civilisations and how they’ve
10:16
changed. And I want to before I digress too far down that rabbit hole as
10:23
I have a tendency of doing, but bringing it back to that whole point of understanding who we are can help us
10:32
help each other absolutely in what drives us forward because what makes us uniquely human is
10:38
our ability to innovate and change our environment, make things better for the next generation. you know, planting
10:44
a tree not because we get to enjoy it in our lifetimes, but because our generations after us do.
10:52
So, yeah, that’s gotten existential very quickly,
10:57
as sociology tends to do, for sure. And it like I honestly, it’s just so
11:02
impressive. Like I didn’t do my bachelor working full-time but you completed yours while also working
11:11
full-time. Like that that one is incredible, but also how has that social
11:19
understanding of the theories of sociology and your innate curiosity
11:24
influence how you’ve approached this kind of intersection of technology,
11:31
law, obviously some corporate governance in there as well and society or has
11:36
it been the other way around? Has you know your role at Law In Order like had had that initially enlivened no
11:43
you must, you must complete this study tell me more. Very interesting question I think I
11:50
do get asked well I I did when I was undertaking my degree you know people
11:55
would wonder how can an arts degree contribute to legal services and tech or basically anything outside the realm of
12:03
kind of arts and sociology I would say my social understanding and curiosity is what drives me and that comes
12:09
predominantly from my degree at work. Now I’m driven by a need to build in
12:15
ethics and regulatory compliance with functionality and efficiency. Some people look at that and say Claudia
12:20
you’re a bit boring but it is a passion. It’s true. Importantly my curiosity is what kind of keeps me engaged and pushes
12:27
me to try and understand the bigger picture when it comes to technology, law and society. Obviously within the
12:32
realm of our organisation but also kind of looking outside of that at the bigger picture and trying to understand
12:39
where are we headed and are we asking the right questions and are we making
12:45
ethical choices. I’m also in a great position within my organisation to
12:51
play a part in the intersection of social responsibility and the legal services space. We have our CSR
12:58
collective so my work in this group spans initiatives like the United Nations Global Compact, sustainability,
13:04
anti-slavery, um, and even things like lifeblood donations. We, you know, have a great team that is supporting all of
13:09
those initiatives internally. Um, and I think beyond this, my role requires me to speak to just about every single
13:15
person in the business. Um, those onshore and offshore, our clients.
13:20
Having a people first approach means actively listening and acknowledging individual experience um, and expertise.
13:27
Ultimately working with these people in this way improves outcomes across the business because there’s an honest
13:33
and open dialogue which is founded in respect, and I think a lot of that
13:38
mindset comes from my time studying sociology and that kind of innate
13:45
interest and curiosity that’s driving me. I think you absolutely nailed that question of you know chicken and egg
13:53
that I lobbed at you. So and I don’t think that too many people even
13:59
know in themselves about what drives them and I think it’s a real gift to
14:05
have that sort of level of introspection so then you can continue to go
14:10
forward. On another note though because I don’t think compliance and governance
14:16
is boring. I think it’s it can be quite sexy. Yes.
14:22
It’s true. It’s true. And it and it is because exactly what you said like it touches on everything that you do. So
14:28
it’s like if you find that like you automatically want to go when you hear
14:36
compliance and oh when you hear governance like I was talking to a a a gentleman um
14:44
he’s done a PhD in governance and he said this really interesting thing and I would like to present this to you
14:52
as part of this conversation. He said you cannot comply your way to
14:57
performance and do you so I think this is kind of leading up to a really the really big
15:05
question that I have for you around ethics, sociology
15:12
like you know how those things encourage us to ask should we rather
15:18
than just can we and how that mindset especially now in the era of AI
15:24
where somehow everybody is going like does it have well, does anybody actually ask does it
15:31
have AI in it or is it like more of everything’s just being put like AI is
15:36
in it now? So it’s like you buy a bag of peas and you see on the label
15:43
now with AI was a meme I saw online and I’m like
15:48
I’m going to carry that with me to everything I do. But like what informs
15:54
that kind of thinking and approach? And now that I’ve like lobbed a whole bunch
16:00
of thoughts to you, you know, your notes probably going to be that helpful.
16:06
No, I have thoughts in return. Don’t worry. Unfiltered. Let’s go. Give me your thoughts.
16:12
Yeah, absolutely. I mean, I think you touched on a really important question. Um, you know, asking should we, not just
16:19
can we? Of course we can. Of course the tools are there and with the
16:25
right people it’s not overly hard to implement these initiatives particularly when it comes to AI. And
16:32
I think it’s the same with a lot of emerging technology.
16:37
We can all acknowledge that AI has its space in legal tech or just tech in general. you know whether it be
16:44
automating workflows and improving outcomes of discovery, transcription, all of that. The possibilities are
16:51
literally endless. That being said and this I think comes a lot from my
16:56
work in our information security team working with our incredible IT department. And of course you know
17:03
my development side and then of course the governance side. Guardrails are required absolutely. Um,
17:09
for example, Law In Order, we take information security incredibly seriously, obviously ongoing um,
17:15
compliance and certification under ISO 27001, which gives us the tools necessary to
17:20
meet our obligations to our clients and of course our staff. We don’t do this just for the sake of it or just to be
17:28
um, seen as a um, trustworthy partner. We do it because we do it
AI, Ethics, and Guardrails
17:34
because we want to be a responsible caretaker of our client data, our staff’s data, all of it. And we
17:40
genuinely care about mitigating risk. Do you think though that have like
17:45
having the guidelines like ISO can be really helpful, this is that whole compliance and and um
17:53
performance thing. Do you think though that having those sorts of boundary lines can actually aid
17:59
innovation because it’s like it’s basically permission to be like hey
18:04
rather than having here’s this massive blank canvas where you do have to go
18:11
should we like we can but should we no I completely agree I mean something
18:17
we’re looking at internally you know we have a we’re actively working on a strategy internally for AI and that kind
18:24
of innovation working with an excellent team of experts across the business and you know we’re looking
18:29
at things like you know ISO 42001 AI systems and you know whether it be ISO
18:36
27001 ISO 40,000 420,0001 you’re not following it blindly you
18:41
are still looking at it within the context of your business and in fact these certifications ask you to do that and so you know of course like the
18:48
regulatory landscape is always evolving in parallel with this technology particularly with AI and particularly
18:53
within in the legal services space. If there was any advice I could give to
18:59
anyone would be to don’t jump in headfirst. Assess where you’re at and where
19:05
this technology is in the context of your business. And don’t just involve those people who are like, “Yes, this is
19:12
going to be the greatest thing ever. It’s going to solve all of our problems.” You need to also involve the people who are going to step back and
19:18
say, “Hey, this is a risk.” because they’re the ones that are going to call upon those guardrails and you know you
19:23
look into what is best practice and how can we be compliant how can we protect the data that we are
19:31
handling. So these guardrails are important set them before joining the
19:37
race so to say it’s something that we have done internally and it’s not something that’s just one and done as
19:43
I said the technology is ever evolving so is the you know regulations we
19:49
need continuous improvement and continuous learning
19:58
It is something that governments really do need to consider implementing regulation around this
20:04
because regulation can encourage that innovation. It can it can help those
20:10
teams know that it is okay to keep pushing forward with the production, the
20:18
productivity. Absolutely. Without having to feel as if oh
20:23
governance team or compliance team or you know legal are slowing us down and which often can can be what it feels
20:30
like and then that creates a lot of like tech tension and friction within team. Absolutely. Yeah. Iit has to go hand
20:37
in hand and that’s what I I’m saying about you know you need to have these blended teams. You need to have those who are all for and not necessarily you
20:44
know people who I don’t I don’t know of anyone who is all against but you need to have I guess maybe the conscientious
20:50
objectors or those who are going to step up and say hey let’s put the brakes on this a little bit and let’s really
20:57
knuckle down into what this means for us. Yeah. And I really read it as it’s
21:02
not so much where it’s you know I’ll hold it’s more of like that engineering
21:07
term of planning and preparation prevents piss poor performance.
21:13
Yes. Yeah. Truly truly absolutey, I think that might be the motto of my entire
21:18
career really. So it’s like planning and prep. Yeah. But then you perform and
21:28
without it like this this is not going to be a snoozefest. This isn’t a snoozefest. Like I think this is a
21:33
fantastic conversation and on that note though like this whole governance piece can be really daunting
21:40
for law firms and it seems though from the sounds of things Law In Order has it all covered. You know you’re
21:45
demystifying it for yourselves and it’s something that you’re obviously really heavily involved in. How do you think
21:52
that we can make governance feel more like a natural part of this
21:58
innovation piece? Like, you know, it’s clearly seen as a bit of a
22:04
hurdle at the moment, but I don’t think it has to be. No, it doesn’t. Not at all. I mean, at
22:11
least to me, governance is about how can we achieve our goals or support those
22:16
who are undertaking the work? How can we build and maintain trust? And of course manage our assets as well. I guess my
22:24
advice at the core of it is maybe it’s been a theme actually through this whole conversation is don’t make it an
22:30
afterthought. You know build it into operational processes and workflows
22:35
Obviously, policy and compliance software and organisational values and
22:40
of course training. And this isn’t just across those who may have governance in their title or chief this or
22:48
you know head of that. It has to come from every layer and everyone has to
22:53
understand why it’s important. And I think that’s a strength that we have at Law In Order. Everyone, whether
23:00
you’re a litigation support clerk on any one of our operation floors, whether you’re in our eHearings team, our
23:05
eDiscovery team, everyone understands why we again have these guardrails, have
23:11
these rules, and have, you know, me popping up every week being like, “Hello, let’s do a compliance check for
23:17
this.” They understand why that’s important,
23:23
not just for themselves and their workflows, but also our clients as well. So it’s multi-layered.
23:30
Aside from that, you have to have those that are responsible. You need to assign these tasks to someone who
23:37
hopefully is curious and looks at it in maybe the way I do in terms of it’s not boring. It can be exciting. It can be a
23:43
process of discovery and make sure that those people are abreast with of course best practice and changing
23:49
regulation. There’s been a lot changing in the privacy space over the last couple of years. There is always
23:55
something new to learn. But most importantly I think from my perspective is it has to come from the
24:02
top. I think that’s with any initiative. again it’s something that the international standards ask for. You
24:09
need to have you know management buy in, leadership buy in. Leadership needs
24:15
to meet the needs of those undertaking governance and give them the tools to succeed. That doesn’t necessarily mean
24:22
getting this system or you know that compliance platform. It can simply mean
24:28
giving them the time to move through often really complex environments, particularly if you’re just building in governance. you know and also with
Governance as an Enabler & AML Compliance
24:35
the knowledge that they’re going to be met with acceptance from all those that they cross paths with. I think it’s the
24:40
important part. Wow. Well, I that is incredibly
24:45
practical advice of you know start starting from the top but understanding the why or what I was thinking when you
24:52
were saying that was the context of tranche two AML coming in for the
24:58
transactional lawyers that so so many that I’ve spoken to in Australia so far
25:04
are a little bit lost even though AUSTRAC are highly encouraging and they’ve
25:11
Got some really great training, free training people. Yeah. And you know, you don’t just like you
25:17
know, it’s not just the vendors that are doing free training. It’s AUSTRAC themselves and they’re very, you know, very open
25:23
and transparent about the sorts of the reason why like why does that
25:29
information and those things need to come into place. And it’s not about turning a lawyer into a investigative
25:37
you know police person you know like it’s it is actually about can be about
25:43
you know protecting your own customer base and your other clients. Absolutely. From you know nefarious actors and
25:50
also like our community safe because we don’t want weapons to be proliferated and
25:56
in order to proliferate weapons they kind of need money. Exactly. Yeah. And then and then all the way
26:02
through like you know as when you were saying about everybody needs to understand why it’s important. It’s
26:09
it’s you know like that whole cyber security training like I would I’d love
26:14
I love doing cyber security training because it’s always like oh there’s always something new. It’s like oh I
26:20
didn’t know they can use QR codes for that. Of course, definitely. And I mean, you know, if if if having a almost selfish
26:28
note to it kind of helps people, you know, these things that you learn and that that you’re doing, you know,
26:33
sitting at your desk at your corporate job help you in your personal life as well and can help the people around you,
26:38
your family, your friends, all of it. So, but yeah, I think you know going
26:46
back to you saying that the advice is practical. It has to be like you said, it can be mysterious. it can be um
26:52
difficult to navigate and understand what we need to do. obviously me taking on the data governance role in
26:58
2023, I’ve only been doing this for a couple of years and the learning curve was steep, you know. thankfully
27:05
there’s we have a great you know team internally that supports you know our chief digital officer
27:12
Murali, our head of IT John Ozturk. they are you know also members of the
27:18
information security team and have not only kind of paved the way in terms of my growth and learning but are
27:25
continuously supportive of these initiatives and having our chief digital officer and our head of IT
27:30
across the organisation being such supporters of these initiatives and being like yes we are going to make the
27:36
time for this that’s what I mean about you know the leadership they also have to genuinely care.
27:42
I think we we’ve come to that that part where I shuffle some cards really terribly
27:47
and I make guests very nervous because this is this is the conversation
27:53
topic no one prepares for but they’re always so delightful
27:59
and I’m sure it’ll be fun. Oh, I’m really excited. This conversation we can we can talk for
28:04
hours and it’s very fun. So, oh,
28:12
if you had to be in isolation for 2 weeks with just three other people.
28:18
Wow. Who would you choose and why? Oh my goodness. Okay. Um, I’m assuming
28:26
living or dead. That tends to be the general kind of. Oh, you can you can apply your own rules in
28:31
your own rules. Okay. Oh my goodness. All right. Gosh, you know, I was asked this actually not that long ago,
28:38
which is quite strange. So let me have a think. Okay. Well, I mean,
28:45
one thing about me, so we’ve spoken a lot about the sociology side of my degree. That was one of my majors. My
28:51
other was English literature. which I think, you know, feeding back
28:56
into that curiosity thing. That’s a huge part for me. So I think honestly my answers are going to be a little bit
29:02
nerdy, which maybe tracks as well considering we’re talking about software development and you know data governance
29:08
compliance all of that but I think three people in isolation probably I would say one
29:17
would be Brandon Sanderson, he’s an author a prolific author the
29:25
the way of kings and misborn and things like that again very nerdy um
29:31
perhaps another would be probably my husband cuz he’s just my
29:38
best friend. He’s very funny. I think he would and you could cope with being in isolation with him for two weeks.
29:45
Yes. Yes. Absolutely. And then maybe one more. Oh gosh, this is a very difficult question. Um
29:51
one more. Maybe let’s go another author. Their name is V E Schwab. Their work
29:58
is excellent. Almost won book of the year. Dimmick’s book of the year this year. It was the finalist. and yeah,
30:05
their work changed my life this year. So, I think that’s probably my maybe strange top three list for Isolation
30:12
Buddies. Oh, that’s fantastic. Well, well, we’d have to tap into your latent
30:18
literature talent there and maybe, you know, curate a little bit of a book list
30:24
for more than happy for the yeah, fantasy
30:30
and sci-fi nerds out there. I’m definitely your girl. And and there’s there’s a lot you can learn in fiction and um
30:36
absolutely again I mean ties back in, right? I think how can we not
30:42
literature particularly you know fiction it’s pushing us to understand you
30:48
know the bounds of our reality and a lot of our current technology is coming from the imaginings of people you know 75
30:56
100 years ago so in that way we can definitely be looking into the future.
The Isolation Card Question & Book Chat
31:02
This has been the law and beyond show on the people and legal podcast. If you
31:07
haven’t already, give us a follow on your chosen platform that you’re listening to this. And if you’re
31:14
watching on YouTube, please subscribe and make sure you turn on notifications.
31:20
We will see you next
15:54
that kind of thinking and approach? And now that I’ve like lobbed a whole bunch
16:00
of thoughts to you, you know, your notes probably going to be that helpful.
16:06
No, I have thoughts in return. Don’t worry. Unfiltered. Let’s go. Give me your thoughts.
16:12
Yeah, absolutely. I mean, I think you touched on a really important question. Um, you know, asking should we, not just
16:19
can we? Of course we can. Of course the tools are there and with the
16:25
right people it’s not overly hard to implement these initiatives particularly when it comes to AI. And
16:32
I think it’s the same with a lot of emerging technology.
16:37
We can all acknowledge that AI has its space in legal tech or just tech in general. you know whether it be
16:44
automating workflows and improving outcomes of discovery, transcription, all of that. The possibilities are
16:51
literally endless. That being said and this I think comes a lot from my
16:56
work in our information security team working with our incredible IT department. And of course you know
17:03
my development side and then of course the governance side. Guardrails are required absolutely. Um,
17:09
for example, Law In Order, we take information security incredibly seriously, obviously ongoing um,
17:15
compliance and certification under ISO 27001, which gives us the tools necessary to
17:20
meet our obligations to our clients and of course our staff. We don’t do this just for the sake of it or just to be
17:28
um, seen as a um, trustworthy partner. We do it because we do it
AI, Ethics, and Guardrails
17:34
because we want to be a responsible caretaker of our client data, our staff’s data, all of it. And we
17:40
genuinely care about mitigating risk. Do you think though that have like
17:45
having the guidelines like ISO can be really helpful, this is that whole compliance and and um
17:53
performance thing. Do you think though that having those sorts of boundary lines can actually aid
17:59
innovation because it’s like it’s basically permission to be like hey
18:04
rather than having here’s this massive blank canvas where you do have to go
18:11
should we like we can but should we no I completely agree I mean something
18:17
we’re looking at internally you know we have a we’re actively working on a strategy internally for AI and that kind
18:24
of innovation working with an excellent team of experts across the business and you know we’re looking
18:29
at things like you know ISO 42001 AI systems and you know whether it be ISO
18:36
27001 ISO 40,000 420,0001 you’re not following it blindly you
18:41
are still looking at it within the context of your business and in fact these certifications ask you to do that and so you know of course like the
18:48
regulatory landscape is always evolving in parallel with this technology particularly with AI and particularly
18:53
within in the legal services space. If there was any advice I could give to
18:59
anyone would be to don’t jump in headfirst. Assess where you’re at and where
19:05
this technology is in the context of your business. And don’t just involve those people who are like, “Yes, this is
19:12
going to be the greatest thing ever. It’s going to solve all of our problems.” You need to also involve the people who are going to step back and
19:18
say, “Hey, this is a risk.” because they’re the ones that are going to call upon those guardrails and you know you
19:23
look into what is best practice and how can we be compliant how can we protect the data that we are
19:31
handling. So these guardrails are important set them before joining the
19:37
race so to say it’s something that we have done internally and it’s not something that’s just one and done as
19:43
I said the technology is ever evolving so is the you know regulations we
19:49
need continuous improvement and continuous learning
19:58
It is something that governments really do need to consider implementing regulation around this
20:04
because regulation can encourage that innovation. It can it can help those
20:10
teams know that it is okay to keep pushing forward with the production, the
20:18
productivity. Absolutely. Without having to feel as if oh
20:23
governance team or compliance team or you know legal are slowing us down and which often can can be what it feels
20:30
like and then that creates a lot of like tech tension and friction within team. Absolutely. Yeah. Iit has to go hand
20:37
in hand and that’s what I I’m saying about you know you need to have these blended teams. You need to have those who are all for and not necessarily you
20:44
know people who I don’t I don’t know of anyone who is all against but you need to have I guess maybe the conscientious
20:50
objectors or those who are going to step up and say hey let’s put the brakes on this a little bit and let’s really
20:57
knuckle down into what this means for us. Yeah. And I really read it as it’s
21:02
not so much where it’s you know I’ll hold it’s more of like that engineering
21:07
term of planning and preparation prevents piss poor performance.
21:13
Yes. Yeah. Truly truly absolutey, I think that might be the motto of my entire
21:18
career really. So it’s like planning and prep. Yeah. But then you perform and
21:28
without it like this this is not going to be a snoozefest. This isn’t a snoozefest. Like I think this is a
21:33
fantastic conversation and on that note though like this whole governance piece can be really daunting
21:40
for law firms and it seems though from the sounds of things Law In Order has it all covered. You know you’re
21:45
demystifying it for yourselves and it’s something that you’re obviously really heavily involved in. How do you think
21:52
that we can make governance feel more like a natural part of this
21:58
innovation piece? Like, you know, it’s clearly seen as a bit of a
22:04
hurdle at the moment, but I don’t think it has to be. No, it doesn’t. Not at all. I mean, at
22:11
least to me, governance is about how can we achieve our goals or support those
22:16
who are undertaking the work? How can we build and maintain trust? And of course manage our assets as well. I guess my
22:24
advice at the core of it is maybe it’s been a theme actually through this whole conversation is don’t make it an
22:30
afterthought. You know build it into operational processes and workflows
22:35
Obviously, policy and compliance software and organisational values and
22:40
of course training. And this isn’t just across those who may have governance in their title or chief this or
22:48
you know head of that. It has to come from every layer and everyone has to
22:53
understand why it’s important. And I think that’s a strength that we have at Law In Order. Everyone, whether
23:00
you’re a litigation support clerk on any one of our operation floors, whether you’re in our eHearings team, our
23:05
eDiscovery team, everyone understands why we again have these guardrails, have
23:11
these rules, and have, you know, me popping up every week being like, “Hello, let’s do a compliance check for
23:17
this.” They understand why that’s important,
23:23
not just for themselves and their workflows, but also our clients as well. So it’s multi-layered.
23:30
Aside from that, you have to have those that are responsible. You need to assign these tasks to someone who
23:37
hopefully is curious and looks at it in maybe the way I do in terms of it’s not boring. It can be exciting. It can be a
23:43
process of discovery and make sure that those people are abreast with of course best practice and changing
23:49
regulation. There’s been a lot changing in the privacy space over the last couple of years. There is always
23:55
something new to learn. But most importantly I think from my perspective is it has to come from the
24:02
top. I think that’s with any initiative. again it’s something that the international standards ask for. You
24:09
need to have you know management buy in, leadership buy in. Leadership needs
24:15
to meet the needs of those undertaking governance and give them the tools to succeed. That doesn’t necessarily mean
24:22
getting this system or you know that compliance platform. It can simply mean
24:28
giving them the time to move through often really complex environments, particularly if you’re just building in governance. you know and also with
Governance as an Enabler & AML Compliance
24:35
the knowledge that they’re going to be met with acceptance from all those that they cross paths with. I think it’s the
24:40
important part. Wow. Well, I that is incredibly
24:45
practical advice of you know start starting from the top but understanding the why or what I was thinking when you
24:52
were saying that was the context of tranche two AML coming in for the
24:58
transactional lawyers that so so many that I’ve spoken to in Australia so far
25:04
are a little bit lost even though AUSTRAC are highly encouraging and they’ve
25:11
Got some really great training, free training people. Yeah. And you know, you don’t just like you
25:17
know, it’s not just the vendors that are doing free training. It’s AUSTRAC themselves and they’re very, you know, very open
25:23
and transparent about the sorts of the reason why like why does that
25:29
information and those things need to come into place. And it’s not about turning a lawyer into a investigative
25:37
you know police person you know like it’s it is actually about can be about
25:43
you know protecting your own customer base and your other clients. Absolutely. From you know nefarious actors and
25:50
also like our community safe because we don’t want weapons to be proliferated and
25:56
in order to proliferate weapons they kind of need money. Exactly. Yeah. And then and then all the way
26:02
through like you know as when you were saying about everybody needs to understand why it’s important. It’s
26:09
it’s you know like that whole cyber security training like I would I’d love
26:14
I love doing cyber security training because it’s always like oh there’s always something new. It’s like oh I
26:20
didn’t know they can use QR codes for that. Of course, definitely. And I mean, you know, if if if having a almost selfish
26:28
note to it kind of helps people, you know, these things that you learn and that that you’re doing, you know,
26:33
sitting at your desk at your corporate job help you in your personal life as well and can help the people around you,
26:38
your family, your friends, all of it. So, but yeah, I think you know going
26:46
back to you saying that the advice is practical. It has to be like you said, it can be mysterious. it can be um
26:52
difficult to navigate and understand what we need to do. obviously me taking on the data governance role in
26:58
2023, I’ve only been doing this for a couple of years and the learning curve was steep, you know. thankfully
27:05
there’s we have a great you know team internally that supports you know our chief digital officer
27:12
Murali, our head of IT John Ozturk. they are you know also members of the
27:18
information security team and have not only kind of paved the way in terms of my growth and learning but are
27:25
continuously supportive of these initiatives and having our chief digital officer and our head of IT
27:30
across the organisation being such supporters of these initiatives and being like yes we are going to make the
27:36
time for this that’s what I mean about you know the leadership they also have to genuinely care.
27:42
I think we we’ve come to that that part where I shuffle some cards really terribly
27:47
and I make guests very nervous because this is this is the conversation
27:53
topic no one prepares for but they’re always so delightful
27:59
and I’m sure it’ll be fun. Oh, I’m really excited. This conversation we can we can talk for
28:04
hours and it’s very fun. So, oh,
28:12
if you had to be in isolation for 2 weeks with just three other people.
28:18
Wow. Who would you choose and why? Oh my goodness. Okay. Um, I’m assuming
28:26
living or dead. That tends to be the general kind of. Oh, you can you can apply your own rules in
28:31
your own rules. Okay. Oh my goodness. All right. Gosh, you know, I was asked this actually not that long ago,
28:38
which is quite strange. So let me have a think. Okay. Well, I mean,
28:45
one thing about me, so we’ve spoken a lot about the sociology side of my degree. That was one of my majors. My
28:51
other was English literature. which I think, you know, feeding back
28:56
into that curiosity thing. That’s a huge part for me. So I think honestly my answers are going to be a little bit
29:02
nerdy, which maybe tracks as well considering we’re talking about software development and you know data governance
29:08
compliance all of that but I think three people in isolation probably I would say one
29:17
would be Brandon Sanderson, he’s an author a prolific author the
29:25
the way of kings and misborn and things like that again very nerdy um
29:31
perhaps another would be probably my husband cuz he’s just my
29:38
best friend. He’s very funny. I think he would and you could cope with being in isolation with him for two weeks.
29:45
Yes. Yes. Absolutely. And then maybe one more. Oh gosh, this is a very difficult question. Um
29:51
one more. Maybe let’s go another author. Their name is V E Schwab. Their work
29:58
is excellent. Almost won book of the year. Dimmick’s book of the year this year. It was the finalist. and yeah,
30:05
their work changed my life this year. So, I think that’s probably my maybe strange top three list for Isolation
30:12
Buddies. Oh, that’s fantastic. Well, well, we’d have to tap into your latent
30:18
literature talent there and maybe, you know, curate a little bit of a book list
30:24
for more than happy for the yeah, fantasy
30:30
and sci-fi nerds out there. I’m definitely your girl. And and there’s there’s a lot you can learn in fiction and um
30:36
absolutely again I mean ties back in, right? I think how can we not
30:42
literature particularly you know fiction it’s pushing us to understand you
30:48
know the bounds of our reality and a lot of our current technology is coming from the imaginings of people you know 75
30:56
100 years ago so in that way we can definitely be looking into the future.
The Isolation Card Question & Book Chat
31:02
This has been the law and beyond show on the people and legal podcast. If you
31:07
haven’t already, give us a follow on your chosen platform that you’re listening to this. And if you’re
31:14
watching on YouTube, please subscribe and make sure you turn on notifications.
31:20
We will see you next